[kernel] Add patch for i.MX6 Utilite device dtb, drop old exynos patch

[Josh Boyer]

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Peter Robinson
<pbrobinson at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> commit ac67590916a449d1e71a791f6a0c3688251ec074
> Author: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com>
> Date:   Thu Oct 24 20:29:40 2013 +0100
>
>     Add patch for i.MX6 Utilite device dtb, drop old exynos patch

I thought we discussed on IRC that patches were going to get sent to
the list first?

> diff --git a/config-arm-generic b/config-arm-generic
> index 96a95e5..aaa88ee 100644
> --- a/config-arm-generic
> +++ b/config-arm-generic
> @@ -114,8 +114,6 @@ CONFIG_MFD_CORE=m
>  CONFIG_SMC91X=m
>  CONFIG_SMC911X=m
>
> -CONFIG_VIRTIO_CONSOLE=m
> -

Why did this get dropped?  The commit message doesn't say.

>  # CONFIG_CRYPTO_TEST is not set
>  # CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is not set
>  # CONFIG_XEN is not set


> diff --git a/kernel.spec b/kernel.spec
> index d1ea97d..19e9e4e 100644
> --- a/kernel.spec
> +++ b/kernel.spec
> @@ -675,7 +675,6 @@ Patch15000: nowatchdog-on-virt.patch
>  # lpae
>  Patch21001: arm-lpae-ax88796.patch
>  Patch21004: arm-sound-soc-samsung-dma-avoid-another-64bit-division.patch
> -Patch21005: arm-exynos-mp.patch
>
>  # ARM omap
>  Patch21010: arm-omap-load-tfp410.patch
> @@ -683,6 +682,10 @@ Patch21010: arm-omap-load-tfp410.patch
>  # ARM tegra
>  Patch21020: arm-tegra-usb-no-reset-linux33.patch
>
> +# ARM i.MX6
> +# http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg08276.html
> +Patch21030: arm-imx6-utilite.patch

The link to the discussion is nice and I appreciate it.  Though it
shows that changes have been requested, the patch isn't queued, and it
isn't really fully reviewed.

I don't understand the urgency in adding something that doesn't appear
to be ready according to upstream.  Can you elaborate?

josh