F21 version is now ahead of rawhide version

Bruno Wolff III bruno at wolff.to
Tue Oct 7 06:11:34 UTC 2014


On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:39:24 +0200,
  Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info> wrote:
>Lo!
>
>Bruno Wolff III wrote on 07.10.2014 05:07:
>> I don't think it is worth doing another build just for this, but if
>> there is another 3.17 build in rawhide, it would be nice to use a
>> release in the 400s so it stays ahead of the f21 version.
>
>Why not move the %{?dist} to the front instead of having a numbers in
>the 400s there, as sooner or later we'll get to 1000 and then it will
>look even more ridiculous.

That doesn't happen, because as each new upstream release is done, the 
numbers are reset. The most you get is 4xx (when there is a rawhide, 
branched and two supported releases or rawhide and three supported releases).

>I know, I might sound like a broken record, as I have suggested that
>before. But last time it wasn't really discussed, as I was a bit late
>and it was mostly shot down with something like "we made a decision, we
>stick to that" (at least it felt like that to me and/or that's what I
>remember from it).

I vaguely remember that conversation, but I am pretty sure it came up 
that we can reset the numbers with each kernel release, so that they 
don't keep increasing forever.


More information about the kernel mailing list