[Fedora-legal-list] CC BY SA 3.0 unported or ported or ...

[Karsten Wade]

On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:47:28PM -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Karsten Wade<kwade at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Which do we want to use when relicening all Fedora content and as our
> > default license choice (for now)?  Or is it really a three-way choice?
> 
> Call me an id10t, but I'm not sure what the differences are.  Is it
> just that the text of the license is adapted to a specific country's
> laws?  Or is there something more going on that I'm not sure of???

Yeah, that's my read.  Ported have been localized, presumably either
in a local language or perhaps even legally vetted ... I'm not clear
which.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener
http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/attachments/20090706/7ed6a589/attachment.sig>