[Fedora-legal-list] EUPL v1.1 ?

[Luis Villa]

I have not looked at the final draft, but as I understand it the purpose of
issuing eupl 1.1 was to make it osi compliant. So it *should* be good now.

Luis

On May 29, 2009 9:35 AM, "Caolán McNamara" <caolanm at redhat.com> wrote:

On this list previously the EUPL v1.0 was considered unacceptable for
Fedora,
(http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-legal-list@redhat.com/msg00144.html)

Since then, there is now a EUPL v1.1, http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/eupl
does that fix the problems, or remain unacceptable ?

Assuming that the EUPL v1.1 remains unacceptable, can someone e.g. dual
licence something as EUPL v1.X and say LGPLv2 in order to make it
acceptable for us.

C.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/attachments/20090529/c0f4d14d/attachment.html>