[Fedora-legal-list] FPCA and packaging documentation

[Tom "spot" Callaway]

On 04/19/2010 05:08 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I don't remember seeing information on whether the project preferred an
> explicit or default license for spec files nor how to document a different
> license for the spec file (presumably the license tag doesn't apply to it)
> than for the remainder of the package. (A quick search didn't find anything
> either, but there could be some documentation that I didn't find.)
> 
> It would probably be a good idea to better document this in the packaging
> guidelines.

We don't care. It is entirely up to the contributor, neither is
preferred, both are supported.

~spot