[Fedora-legal-list] PHP PEAR channel definition license

[Jon Stanley]

On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote:
> Umm, why would you package something that only contained such a file?
> I'm assuming it points to PHP PEAR code, why aren't you packaging that?

I'm not packaging anything :)

I'm asking the question for David Nalley, who asked the question of
me.  To directly answer the question though, the PHP packaging
guidelines seem to require this -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#PEAR_Packages_from_a_non_standard_channel.2Frepository
and there are many examples already in the package collection:

[jstanley at monster Packages]$ ls -l php-channel*
-rw-r--r-- 4 jstanley jstanley 4352 2009-10-03 00:41
php-channel-doctrine-1.0.0-2.fc12.noarch.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 4 jstanley jstanley 4364 2009-08-08 13:17
php-channel-ezc-1-2.fc12.noarch.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 4 jstanley jstanley 5032 2009-08-12 14:40
php-channel-phing-1.0.0-7.fc12.noarch.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 4 jstanley jstanley 4848 2009-08-08 16:39
php-channel-phpdb-1.0.0-6.fc12.noarch.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 2 jstanley jstanley 4500 2009-08-12 22:37
php-channel-phpunit-1.0-4.fc12.noarch.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 2 jstanley jstanley 4592 2009-08-12 14:45
php-channel-symfony-1.0.0-4.fc12.noarch.rpm