[Fedora-legal-list] CUPS scsi backend licensing issue

[Tim Waugh]

On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 09:19 -0800, Julius Davies wrote:
> In this case I think it's fine!  Thanks so much for looking into this,
> and especially for providing a great picture of the actual connections
> between the binary files.  I see this "backend/scsi" executable really
> does come from only scsi.c and scsi-linux.c.
> 
> $ objdump -D  -l cups-1.4.2/backend/scsi |  grep cups-1.4.2 | sort
> 
> /home/julius/cups/cups-1.4.2/backend/scsi.c:110
> [etc....]
> /home/julius/cups/cups-1.4.2/backend/scsi-linux.c:112
> [etc....]

Well, and it dynamically links to libcups.so.2:

$ ldd /usr/lib/cups/backend/scsi | grep cups
	libcups.so.2 => /usr/lib64/libcups.so.2 (0x00007f19e21dd000)

But that's OK?

Tim.
*/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/attachments/20100225/69ca0009/attachment.sig>