On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:37:11 +0100 "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote: >On 03/01/2010 02:28 PM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote: >> Are they the same as "Consequential Damages"? > >IANAL, but I'd say yes from what I'm seeing. > >~spot Ok, thanks Spot!