[Fedora-legal-list] License header for config files?

[Till Maas]

Hi,

I asked for proper licensing on a project I was going to package and the
question came up, whether config files should have a license header.

The ticket at their issue tracker is here:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2869635&group_id=261773&atid=1127533

The config file can be accessed here:
http://rcracki.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/rcracki/rcracki_mt/rcracki_mt.ini?revision=9&view=markup

What is your advise here?

Regards
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/attachments/20100524/69ce6580/attachment.sig>