[Fedora-legal-list] License header of some KDE applications

[Julian Aloofi]

Am Montag, den 07.02.2011, 16:54 -0500 schrieb Tom Callaway:
> On 02/07/2011 04:06 PM, Richard Fontana wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:59:12PM -0500, Tom Callaway wrote:
> >> On 02/07/2011 03:52 PM, Richard Fontana wrote:
> >>> Maybe it's only
> >>> practical for Fedora to label this as "GPLv2 or GPLv3", and if in the
> >>> distant future the KDE organization also approved GPLv4 the license
> >>> tag could just be updated accordingly (much like any special license
> >>> change might be treated). Look to spot for the official answer though.
> >>
> >> I think this is sensible. Handle it like this:
> >>
> >> # KDE e.V. may determine that future GPL versions are accepted
> >> License: GPLv2 and GPLv3
> > 
> > Shouldn't it be "GPLv2 or GPLv3"? It's like a (disjunctive) dual
> > license.
> 
> Yes, you're right. It is a Monday.
> 
> # KDE e.V. may determine that future GPL versions are accepted
> License: GPLv2 or GPLv3
> 
> ~tom
> 
Thanks to both of you for the quick clarification! :)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/attachments/20110207/24de7173/attachment.sig>