[Fedora-legal-list] Stardict and unspecified legal issues
karl at kgoetz.id.au
Sun Jul 10 01:29:45 UTC 2011
On Sat, 9 Jul 2011 08:49:55 +0400
Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> wrote:
> The stardict project was recently removed from SF due to unspecified
> legal issues. In fact it was moved to Google Code, which was very
> surprising to me, because I can hardly imagine a legal issue valid on
> SF but invalid on Google Code.
> Anyway, keeping in mind that the project owners claimed that "the
> legal issues may never have been resolved" I think it's time to
> reconsider whether we can ship it or not.
> * http://stardict.sourceforge.net/
> * http://code.google.com/p/stardict-3/
I'm not involved in fedora, i'm just commenting based on a checkout
from google code above.
* main licence listed as GPL3+
* Some files have copyright notices before 2007 which is when GPL3 was
released - i didn't search the 'net to try and find references to the
listed author authorising a latter licence.
(eg dict/tests/t_fuzzy.cpp dict/tests/t_dict_client.cpp)
* A file appears to be CPL, which the wiki says is not GPL compatible
. I didn't check if this file is built in or not.
(eg dict/stardict-plugins/stardict-wordnet-plugin/tenis.h )
* Some files appears to have no licence, i don't know if if it is
assumed to be under the main licence or not.
(eg dict/src/sigc++config/sigc++config.h dict/src/sigc++/signal.h)
* Following on from that point, lots of files (without copyright
notices) say they are generated. From what? signal.h above is an
A close examination would probably show more, i found that lot by
running the licencecheck script (in debian - does fedora have one?) and
double checking the file headers.
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
No, I won't join your social networking group
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the legal