[Fedora-legal-list] Is the Dxflib license free?
tcallawa at redhat.com
Tue Oct 18 14:13:17 UTC 2011
On 10/17/2011 03:07 PM, Volker Fröhlich wrote:
> The headers in the various file mention GPLv2. With all the rubble in the
> license, around mentioning it was GPLv2, is this certainly free software?
No, this license mess is non-free. In it, it says:
"and the GPL-based source code must be made available upon request"
A free software license cannot force a user to distribute source code
except in limited circumstances (when a corresponding binary is
distributed, or deployed as a network service). See the FSF's
comments on the original nonfree Apple Public Source License:
There are other areas that make this beast non-free, but this is perhaps
the most glaring.
More information about the legal