[Fedora-legal-list] ii package license

[Matěj Cepl]

On 3.2.2012 12:57, Josh Boyer wrote:
> It's similar to WTFPL, but not enough to be called that.  Spot is
> at FOSDEM, so this will probably need to wait until he looks it
> over.  If it were me, I'd ask upstream to relicense it to something
> a bit more standard in any case.

"ask upstream"? You must be new here.

This is from the upstream which one of his programs have this as 
enlisted advantage of the program: "Because dwm is customized through 
editing its source code, it’s pointless to make binary packages of it. 
This keeps its userbase small and elitist. No novices asking stupid 
questions."

Matěj