[Fedora-livecd-list] Kadischi - USB fork?

[Jane Dogalt]

--- Jasper O'neal Hartline <jasperhartline at adelphia.net> wrote:

> Filip Tsachev wrote:
> 
> > I guess this fork has the potential to utilise different concept as
> > it's RW media.
> >
> No. SquashFS is still read-only filesystem.

As you mentioned, it isn't that different (in some manifestations) from the
kadischi output.  Thus why fork instead of just making it a kadischi feature? 
Certainly you would work in your own tree until you've got a clean feature
addition patch, but forking doesn't make sense IMO.  Certainly kadischi should
handle usb sticks as gracefully (or hopefully more gracefully) than knoppix,
and a live-usb is just like sticking your livecd in the stick.

I'm guessing using a fairly static ROM image might be better anyway as a lot of
flash wouldn't hold up that well to frequent small writes (if it was used as a
generic rw fs)

my 0.02...

-jdog


> 
> J. Hartline
> 
> --
> Fedora-livecd-list mailing list
> Fedora-livecd-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com