[Fedora-livecd-list] Re: livecd persistence

[Douglas McClendon]

Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 16:40 -0500, Douglas McClendon wrote:
> 
>> Lastly, wouldn't test2 require an approved feature?  
> 
> Thats the downside of the new feature process with all the approval and 
> tracking and red tape. People start to think that they are not allowed
> to work on cool stuff unless it has been approved....

To who are you referring?  I've already posted a (rough) implementation, 
and asdas at redhat.com claims to have an alternate implementation (though 
I doubt the claim that it was posted to livecd-list, as I don't remember 
seeing it).

Clearly nobody, relating to the livecd persistence issue, thinks that 
they aren't allowed to work on cool stuff.  We've already got 2 
implementations, and it sounds like Jeremy may be starting a 3rd next week.

-dmc