[Fedora-livecd-list] cachedir conflict... bug?

[Jesse Keating]

On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:07:10 -0500
Jeremy Katz <katzj at redhat.com> wrote:

> Don't do that.  You're basically saying that you have a repository
> named foo but foo is two different things depending on how you run.  
> 
> [snip]
> > Are there any genuine bugs in anything I described above?
> > Shouldn't yum warn or error out when it sees the repodata arch
> > conflict?  
> 
> repodata doesn't have an inherent archness.  You can have repodata
> containing packages of all arches.  

FWIW in pungi I use a single cache name for all arches.  However for
every single run I expire the metadata and require fresh metadata be
downloaded.  This seems to work for me, not many people have complained
about getting new repodata every run.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/livecd/attachments/20080219/fbc84664/attachment.bin