Zikula up on pt15

Paul W. Frields stickster at gmail.com
Wed Aug 12 20:49:00 UTC 2009


On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 01:23:29PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On 08/10/2009 07:34 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Paul W. Frields<stickster at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:05:58AM -0400, Eric Christensen wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 14:34, David
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes they are, I think I passed SRPMs to Toshio already for inclusion
> >>>> in infra's repos
> >>>>
> >>>> Here are the SRPMs
> >>>> http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zikula-module-fedora-theme-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm
> >>>> http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zikula-module-fedora-fasauth-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm
> >>>
> 
> > 
> > So these are fedora-specific zikula modules. FAS auth and the
> > fedora-theme are not likely to be used elsewhere, so they should
> > likely live only in infra's internal repository, not EPEL.
> > Toshio may be able to shed more light on the process for getting
> > packages into infra's repo, but I believe I have already submitted the
> > packages to him for inclusion.
> 
> Sorry, I forgot about this.  I'm building them for the infrastructure
> repo right now.
> 
> Do we want fasauth to go into Fedora itself?  Will people be testing
> zikula on their own machines?  Would being able to easily install
> fasauth help them do so?  I'm not sure precisely how we're developing
> our zikula installation so that might not be a concern here.

I *think* the answer is yes -- that we want people to be able to
effectively sandbox a Zikula locally to develop workflows that they
can then propose to a wider group.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug


More information about the logistics mailing list