Drupal Versioning in EPEL

Eric "Sparks" Christensen sparks at fedoraproject.org
Fri Oct 15 10:55:12 UTC 2010


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/15/2010 06:02 AM, Sven Lankes wrote:
> Fedora has a bunch of drupal-modules called drupal-modulename with a
> version of 6.x-1.2 (which is what upstream uses to show that this is for
> the drupal 6 range).

I was a bit over-cautious when I saw the "X" in the versioning.  I spoke
to several folks over in #fedora-devel which raised the concern that the
X might have problems down the road if they ever changed the X to a number.

> Eric suggests in the review [1] that I call the package
> drupal6-flexinode-1.2 instead of drupal-flexinode-6.x-1.2 - but that
> name would only work for EPEL as the other drupal modules which are
> already in Fedora are following the 6.x-1.2 naming scheme.

If this is already being done on other packages (I didn't look) then
perhaps keeping the same throughout would be a good thing.

Personally I'm not a fan of maintaining the same package with different
names.  Just doesn't feel like a good solution to me.
> 
> I'm not very experienced wrt. EPEL packaging so I may be missing best
> practices here but having a completely separate drupal stack for EPEL
> (with two reviews per package ...) feels very wrong to me.
> 
> Not sure how feasible it is wrt. the progress of fedora insight but I'd
> think that the best way forward would be to leave EL-5 on Drupal 5,
> update the drupal package in EL-6 to Drupal 6.
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642856
> [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569833
> 

- --Eric
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=DJFy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the logistics mailing list