Drupal Versioning in EPEL

Eric "Sparks" Christensen sparks at fedoraproject.org
Mon Oct 18 17:25:49 UTC 2010


On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 13:09, Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> wrote:
> Eric "Sparks" Christensen wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:01, Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:47:49AM -0400, Eric Sparks Christensen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> And it's now basically decided that I need to take the X out of the
>>>>>> EVR for all modules, and transtion drupal* to drupal6* in rawhide, and
>>>>>> to drupal5* in EL-5? If this is correct, I'll get on it this week.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Unless we want to suggest a change to the FPC which I wouldn't know how
>>>>> to justify.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll change my pending review request to use drupal6* and only request
>>>>> branches for F15 and EL.
>>>>>
>>>> In my opinion this needs to happen.  Let's put together a request for
>>>> the FPC or whoever to evaluate.  This shouldn't be a big deal and we
>>>> are not going to get anywhere just going back and forth here.
>>>> Clearly there is a need here and we can make this happen sooner.
>>>>
>>> Correct me if I'm wrong but I feel that we have now agreed on:
>>>
>>>  1. rename drupal to drupal6 in F15+
>>>
>>
>> Why are we waiting for F15?  Why can't this be done for F14 and
>> previous?  The update would essentially be a package replacement
>> without any configuration change; a trivial change for sysadmins.
>>
>> --Eric
>> _______________________________________________
>> logistics mailing list
>> logistics at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/logistics
>>
> It can, but what would the benefit be to those sysadmins?
>
> -J

I just thought it would be easier to maintain the package and it would
allow those using versions of Fedora <F15 to have access to the
modules.

--Eric


More information about the logistics mailing list