L10N migration to transifex.net

[Karsten Wade]

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 05:17:00PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> 
> The issue was that transifex has been an ongoing problem for the
> following reasons:

<snip important list of reasons/details>

Thanks for providing those details. I meant, and wrote it poorly I'm
sure, that I presume that the situation was much as you described, but
in the end there were people who did not feel/get communicated to. At
that point, Infra and others were saying, "OK, sorry if you didn't
hear about this before, it's been a long-standing problem, and we need
to solve it now before the barn burns down."

So, sorry for characterizing the communication as poor. I think what
I'm seeing could benefit from some change management that all know
about. A lot of times we have to result to a change management list
that goes something like, "OK, ask
$this_list_of_individuals_I_can_think_of, then email
$this_list_of_mailing_lists_I_can_think_of, and write a blog post."

Anyway, I'm sure there is a not-too-much-bureacracy way to do this. I
started this ...

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Change_management

... I'm sure there are others who deal with that all the time around
here, maybe there are some existing processes we can adopt,
incorporate, hug, etc.

Thanks,

- Karsten
-- 
name:  Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Community Gardener
team:                Red Hat Community Architecture 
uri:               http://TheOpenSourceWay.org/wiki
gpg:                                       AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/logistics/attachments/20110224/db03c3c2/attachment.bin