L10N migration to transifex.net

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 23:12, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll answer some of this.  Smooge can feel free to answer differently,
> from his perspective :-)  I'm more on  the developer side of
> infrastructure and he's more on the sysadmin side so we do have
> different ways of looking at things.  On the subject of  moving to
> transifex.net we were both in agreement that transifex.net held
> numerous advantages over our current situation so hopefully our
> perspectives here won't be too different :-)

I am going to say that Toshio hit all the points I could make. The
lack of progress on moving forward with 0.9.1 was a lack of dedicated
developers and sysadmins. Looking at this I think that we need to have
an equivalent of pkdb where we can show who is the maintainer and
co-maintainer on items... so that we can all know what is currently
"orphaned".





-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
"The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance."
Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
"Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard
battle." -- Ian MacLaren