Update on the MailScanner in Fedora packaging situation

[Eli Wapniarski]

OK then. It will take me a little while to get to it. But, I will start soonest possible

Do you know of anyway to track cpan for the latest version of any paticular module?

Eli

On Monday 25 May 2009 18:39:30 David Nalley wrote:
> We don't have to package for F-9 (when you request CVS you can request
> only certain versions) and the last few of my rpms I have explicitly
> left off F-9.
> Sooo, don't let that stop you. Lets try and announce here what we are
> working on, so as not to duplicate work and to trade reviews.
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Eli Wapniarski
> <eli at orbsky.homelinux.org> wrote:
> > So.... I guess the first step would be to get the missing perl modules packaged. I would suggest waiting until F-9 is officially dead. So we don't leave F-9 users stuck in security patch limbo.
> >
> > Eli
> >
> > On Friday 22 May 2009 22:39:01 David Nalley wrote:
> >> 13 packages definitely need to be packaged. Mostly perl modules
> >> 23 packages already exist. For the most part these are on par or later
> >> versions than mailscanner includes. 2 perl modules look a bit out of
> >> date and we might file bugs requesting an update with the current
> >> maintainers.
> >> 4 packages have some very close name matches - so we'll need to check
> >> on the status of those in the source and see if they are really
> >> already existent or also need to be built.
> >>
> >> Details here:
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MailScanner_in_Fedora#List_of_MailScanner_RPMs_Required_and_their_Status_Within_Fedora_-_.28Date_last_edited_-_22.2F05.2F09.29
> >>
> >> Anyone want to start staking claims?? We can trade reviews amongst
> >> ourselves and hopefully whittle this list down quickly.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mailscanner-sig mailing list
> >> mailscanner-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner-sig
> >>
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mailscanner-sig mailing list
> > mailscanner-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner-sig
> >
> _______________________________________________
> mailscanner-sig mailing list
> mailscanner-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner-sig
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.