[Fwd: Re: RPM Article]

[Marc Wiriadisastra]

I received a very quick response from the original author and he is
quite correct at date of when the article was published.  The
unfortunate thing is that he has not pointed that out in any future
articles.

I find that wierd that authors whether good or bad do not seem to point
out that it is not valid anymore and prefer to keep the bad in place for
an astronomicle (typo) amount of time.

Regards,

Marc

P.S.  I attached his response for all I didn't request annonymity hence
I've attached.  

P.P.S. I didn't include any reference to fedora-marketing if anyone was
curious due to the fact that I don't feel my opinion represents the
group and the fact that what I say is not what everyone says.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Ladislav Bodnar <distro at distrowatch.com>
Subject: Re: RPM Article
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:42:50 +0800
Size: 1878
Url: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/attachments/20050819/33891e41/attachment.mht