Wording of Legal Issues myth
Patrick Barnes
nman64 at n-man.com
Sat Aug 20 22:37:54 UTC 2005
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 00:19 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>
>>Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 23:42 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Do you have wiki access, If so you can edit the wiki yourself. Link to
>>>>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ForbiddenItems which clarifies the status
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Yep. I can commit the change. I just wanted to see if anyone thought
>>>the revision crossed any legal boundaries before doing so.
>>>
>>>-Toshio
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>That page already explains everything in a legally safe now. Is there
>>anything left to add there? . Just linking seems to be less ambiguous to me
>>
>>
>
>It needs to explan that there are reasonably easy fixes to get full
>multimedia. The myth is that Fedora is not suitable in a desktop
>environment because it cannot do multimedia. The Facts are: 1) We don't
>include them for legal reasons (this is already there, incl. the link to
>ForbiddenItems). 2) We are sympathetic to the user's frustration and
>have done what we can to help 3) There is a reasonably easy solution for
>users who need this capability. We don't yet address points 2 and 3.
>
>If you point someone to this page in order to read the legal section
>they currently get the impression that we won't ship for legal reasons
>*so* Fedora will always be second rate in terms of multimedia. I want
>to expand on that so they leave feeling that Fedora won't ship legally
>encumbered code *but* we've done our best to enable users to get the
>multimedia experience they expect.
>
>If their gripe is that they can't play mp3s, only giving an explanation
>of why is telling them "Tough luck" which is a pretty unfriendly
>response. An telling why plus information that we've thought about the
>problem and there are solutions is "We hate the situation too but we're
>doing what we can to not get sued and provide you with the multimedia
>capabilities you desire."
>
>I think my addition makes this second point. If no one thinks it's
>problematic, I'll commit it.
>
>-Toshio
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>--
>Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
>Fedora-marketing-list at redhat.com
>http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
>
I've made a few small changes. Check it out now and see if you feel it
does a better job. I still want to avoid duplicating information
presented on the ForbiddenItems page, but I can certainly agree with
your points.
--
Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes
nman64 at n-man.com
www.n-man.com
--
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/attachments/20050820/1513ff5d/attachment.bin
More information about the marketing
mailing list