FUDCon3 in SF?
Karsten Wade
kwade at redhat.com
Fri Jun 10 00:07:20 UTC 2005
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 18:09 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 10:51:42AM -0700, Colin Charles wrote:
> > > There is great interest at doing it again at BU next year. And we were
> > > thinking the "more serious" thing.
> > Very sweet. BU were great hosts this year, and I'm sure they'll be great
> > next year too! And locality towards Westford make it all the more
> > sensible for FUDConN to be there (at the rate we're going, N might be 4
> > or 5 by then!)
> > And if its the "more serious" thing, we can't pull off 5 a year! erps,
> > Of course, we can.. we just need a correct marketing twist to it
>
> I think the sequential-non-annual numbering is going to be confusing to some
> people. Maybe that's intended. However, maybe the next one here should be
> "Boston FUDCon 2006" rather than FUDCon4 or whatever.
I agree.
This naturally presumes a continued association with LWCE, which is
probably a reasonable assumption. Two in the US is probably enough for
now. Cuts down the intracontinental crossing that is expensive and time
*yawn* consuming.
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41
Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/attachments/20050609/790acdd6/attachment.bin
More information about the marketing
mailing list