Fedora websites team

[Karsten Wade]

We have formed the Fedora websites team, which discusses things on
fedora-websites-list[1].

Some have asked me who really owns/controls the websites.  Is Marketing
accountable?  Documentation?  How about Infrastructure?

Here's how I see it, using this model:

* FDP is the umbrella project that is accountable for all content and
knowledge management across Fedora.  We are growing as fast as we can to
cover all these areas.

* Marketing is accountable for our message, focus, goals, direction,
attitude, etc.  As such, they are often responsible for the content and
design within the various formal Fedora sites[2].

* Infrastructure is responsible for maintaining the current backends of
the sites, and developing new stuff from their own ideas and as
responses to RFEs that are filtered to them by FDP and Marketing.

Does this make sense to you all?

Other thoughts?

cheers - Karsten

[1] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list

This list is for developers, maintainers, designers, and content
managers to discuss the various formal Fedora sites.

[2] Formal being a better word than 'official', and the formal sites
right now are fedora.redhat.com and fedoraproject.org.
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
                       Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/attachments/20051103/71c7c089/attachment.bin