Fedora derivatives branding discussion
che666 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 20 18:30:42 UTC 2006
2006/4/20, Jesse Keating <jkeating at j2solutions.net>:
> On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 20:19 +0200, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> > but its still derived from fedora isnt it? distcc is hanging idle in
> > bugzilla for ages :)
> > someone finish the review.
> No, because (as Max forgot to mention) the Based on Fedora must be based
> on the Binary packages, not rebuilds of the source packages. No
> published Binary, can't use it.
> Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net)
> Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org)
> GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> Fedora-marketing-list at redhat.com
id have to remove all art and branding etc... ok...
but then again calling it "derived of fedora" is legal? i am still
just curious... sorry for keeping on asking the same question. is only
"fork of fedora" legal then?
More information about the marketing