fedora logo on wikipedia
mspevack at redhat.com
Wed Apr 26 20:41:40 UTC 2006
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> And BTW, the article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fedora_Project) is
> short (a stub) and has old information, it could use some love.
Yes, that particular article is not particularly useful, as opposed to
say, wikipedia's "Fedora Core" article which at first glance actually
seemed pretty good.
I think it would be bad form (since you're not supposed to Wikipedia about
yourself) for, say, me to give some love to wikipedia's Fedora pages, but
if, I don't know, the community members who make up Fedora Marketing
wanted to do some more work in there, that wouldn't be a bad thing. :-)
That "Project Organization" chart is interesting. A bit confusing, and a
bit Red Hat focused for my tastes.
Fedora != Red Hat
I'd rather see a description of some of the sub-projects that make up the
larger Fedora Project (Core, Extras, Ambassadors, Docs, and so on) and how
the Fedora Project Board handles all of that.
Wikipedia should be used as a summary of *facts* since it is meant as a
collection of facts, and as a way of pointing people to more facts on the
fp wiki, not as a place where we have to replicate all of our wiki
content. That just makes stuff get out of date.
+ gpg key -- http://people.redhat.com/~mspevack/mspevack.asc
+ fingerprint -- CD52 5E72 369B B00D 9E9A 773E 2FDB CB46 5A17 CF21
More information about the marketing