[Fwd: release announcements]
kwade at redhat.com
Wed May 30 21:51:22 UTC 2007
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 00:57 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> I would want to be involved. Did we get word from rel eng on the device
> name and labels notice? Is it really bad to yum upgrade?
Release announcements are not the place to warn users about stuff;
that's what release notes are all about. To protect the innocent, I put
a nice big pointer at the top of the release announcement.
In addition, the XML-based release notes now carry an admonition on the
top of *every page* to refer to the Web-based notes as canonical.
There are still a few hours to make sure that the info in the Wiki
resolves all the concerns we have about:
* Install boot screen changes
* hda v sda
Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project
Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/attachments/20070530/758d2bfb/attachment.bin
More information about the marketing