Fedora Life Cycle
William Cattey
wdc at MIT.EDU
Tue Oct 23 01:57:45 UTC 2007
Actually, I'm still working the kernel bug that broke the VESA driver
that we opened when the Dell 745 first shipped. I believe that
desktop gets EOLed in the next month or so. The Disk driver to SATA
get off of BIOS compatibility mode came two quarters into the
machine's life cycle. The RHEL 5 driver update to get rid of the
SATA timeouts on start-up won't ship till after the machine is gone
at this rate.
So, yes quarterly updates should, in theory solve the problem.
In practice, they are necessary, but not sufficient.
-Bill
----
William Cattey
Linux Platform Coordinator
MIT Information Services & Technology
N42-040M, 617-253-0140, wdc at mit.edu
http://web.mit.edu/wdc/www/
On Oct 22, 2007, at 9:17 PM, jkeating wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:58:01 -0400
> William Cattey <wdc at MIT.EDU> wrote:
>
>> How can use cases for hardware available now, requiring a few
>> critical apps needing to be ported now be accommodated? Neither
>> Enterprise nor Fedora fits well enough at the present time.
>
> RHEL regularly enables new hardware in the quarterlyish updates. You
> aren't stuck with two year old hardware sets.
>
> --
> Jesse Keating RHCE (jkeating.livejournal.com)
> Fedora Project (fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating)
> GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/
> jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
> --
> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> Fedora-marketing-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
More information about the marketing
mailing list