Associating the Red Hat and Fedora brands?
fugolini at fedoraproject.org
Tue Apr 1 14:33:05 UTC 2008
2008/4/1, JoergSimon <jsimon at fedoraproject.org>:
> Am Montag, 31. März 2008 23:26:33 schrieb Greg DeKoenigsberg:
> > If, in splash screens for Fedora, we put a tasteful "sponsored by Red Hat"
> > with the Shadowman logo somewhere small... how would you all feel about
> > that?
> Let me answer with a mail i answered to Rahul with a reply from Paul Frields.
> I understand it from the RedHat view. But i don´t like this idea!
> cu Joerg
> Jörg Simon
> jsimon at fedoraproject.org
> Key Fingerprint:
> 3691 0989 2DCA 58A2 8D1F 2CAC C823 558E 5B5B 5688
> ---------- Messaggio inoltrato ----------
> From: "Paul W. Frields" <stickster at gmail.com>
> To: fedora-ambassadors-list at redhat.com
> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:10:19 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Ambassadors] Re: Co-branding?
> On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 11:55 +0100, JoergSimon wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2008 11:18:33 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> > > Branding is more concerned with marketing. Besides if ambassadors are
> > > not subscribed to the marketing list, they are not following the
> > > recommend procedure at
> > >
> > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/Join
> > yes
> > > We don't
> > > want to cross post either. Refer
> > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2007-March/msg00007.ht
> > >ml
> > I know the guidelines very well! It was only to shift it to the people who
> > must deal with the consequences of this issue.
> > And if you want play this odd guideline game, then you must admit, we don´t
> > want discuss the same topics again and again! (There are a lot more ... )
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2007-July/msg00086.html
> > I want to stop this, because there was enough confusion in the past. And there
> > are clear guidelines that we are not RedHat - and we don´t want.
> > i will quote GregdeKoenigsberg:
> > "The Fedora brand must evolve separately from Red Hat's brand. Fedora is very
> > important to Red Hat, but Fedora is not Red Hat. It's really crucial to
> > understand that distinction."
> > so -1 again.
> +1 to Joerg, and -1 to co-branding.
> Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
> gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
> http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
> irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
More information about the marketing