blog engine review (was Re: news.fp.o and workflows)
Karsten 'quaid' Wade
kwade at redhat.com
Fri Apr 11 22:38:21 UTC 2008
On Sat, 2008-04-12 at 03:15 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Jonathan Roberts wrote:
> > So, do people have thoughts about these bullets? Things you'd like to do
> > with news.fp.o? Reply and lets see if there are things that need testing
> > or whether the workflow is pretty self-explanatory!
> There seems to be still doubts as to whether we are going with lyceum or
This is not related to what Jon is talking about. He is looking for how
people use a tool to know what to check on the test instance(s) we put
in front of him.
But to follow your post heist, I'll take a chance to mention ...
A few of us with interest in WordPress MU missed the chance to help with
the test previously, and we asked if we could take another shot at
making it work for Fedora. At our current pace, we'll have a better
idea in a week if we need to investigate further in that direction.
Until then we won't know which needs to be packaged.
Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/attachments/20080411/e9bbd2b6/attachment.bin
More information about the marketing