Now, that I got people talking...
lucas at cefetce.br
Wed Jun 18 01:15:54 UTC 2008
why cant we use another free video format that doesn't have this kind of
trouble, shouldn't save us a lot of time and sake ? :D
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:41 AM, Valent Turkovic
> <valent.turkovic at gmail.com> wrote:
> > There are two projects; saya-videoeditor , myvideoeditor 
> saya currently relies on the OpenVIP media framework..which uses ffmpeg.
> the reliance on ffmpeg makes its nearly impossible to include in
> Fedora. I can not stress this enough, applications which have compile
> time dependencies on ffmpeg will be difficult to place in Fedora.
> Unless someone figures out how to patch out the encumbered
> technologies in ffmpeg, we can't ship ffmpeg. And even if we did find
> a way to patch out everything we can't distribute, it may not be worth
> doing because we would be in effect shipping a significantly crippled
> ffmpeg library since ffmpeg does not understand the concept of
> pluggable runtime codec support.
> Its a real shame, if we could ship a limited version of ffmpeg which
> support unencumbered codec technologies we would have the ability to
> ship versions of several multimedia frameworks and applications. But
> the way ffmpeg is structured as a project and a codebase, makes its
> difficult to safely work with.
> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> Fedora-marketing-list at redhat.com
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> :::: CONTRIBUA COM O MEIO AMBIENTE. NÃO IMPRIMA ESTA MENSAGEM :::::
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the marketing