Comments: IN DEPTH: Fedora 10 Preview
Paul W. Frields
stickster at gmail.com
Tue Nov 11 14:22:13 UTC 2008
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 01:32:19PM +0100, Max Spevack wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Russell Harrison wrote:
>> I don't know that I agree here.
> It's all good -- I wasn't necessarily advocating that we *actually* make
> any changes to the release cycle. I was just throwing it out there as
> something for the list to consider.
> Quite a few people disagreed with it, and I think the reasons that you
> and the others outlined are perfectly valid, and I concur.
It's also important that we have those discussions openly so that we
can show them to people who pop in from time to time to ask why we are
or are not pursuing certain strategies.
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/attachments/20081111/6b0090e2/attachment.bin
More information about the marketing