[Ambassadors] Re: store SIG?
mspevack at redhat.com
Mon Oct 27 10:17:41 UTC 2008
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Clint Savage wrote:
> There was some discussion about reviving it FADNA this last month. Not
> sure there was a conclusion other than to say that we all were
> interested in discussing it more and getting it going IIRC.
IMHO, the Store SIG was a more interesting idea before we got to the
point where NA and EMEA ambassadors are both regionally self-sufficient
in producing all the things they need.
It seems like the evolution of Ambassadors may have rendered one of the
Store SIG's goals irrelevant. That's not a bad thing -- progress was
made on the root problem, just in a different way.
Personally, I think the Store SIG can be retired for the time being.
More information about the marketing