Comments about Microsoft and the GPL

Christopher Fikes cfikes at fikesmedia.com
Tue Jul 21 16:02:36 UTC 2009


I agree. Microsoft has too much invested with the current kernel, besides, they dropped their own alternative kernel "midori".


Christopher Fikes
cfikes at fikesmedia.com
409.291.4225 (VoiceMail)
Sent from my BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: "Paul W. Frields" <stickster at gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:00:13 
To: <fedora-marketing-list at redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Comments about Microsoft and the GPL


On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 04:22:13PM +0100, Affix wrote:
> With microsoft contributing to the kernel does this mean we may see a
> unix based windows version. Personally I think windows should be unix
> based as with mac OSX it will greatly increase stability and security.

I don't think it means that at all.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list




More information about the marketing mailing list