Question on Java apps

[David Nalley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Paul W. Frields  wrote:

>
>> Java 6 EE - well the text refers to the Java 6 EE spec, and what's
>> left unsaid is that openJDK is what is meeting the spec. However most
>> people assume that's java-1.6.0-sun when they see Java 6 EE.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Use GnuPG with Firefox : http://getfiregpg.org (Version: 0.7.10)

iEYEARECAAYFAkuVvSUACgkQkZOYj+cNI1enMQCdHDQ0ivcVE0JPtLKJ6JvurACB
JcoAniBm7Jjzh1bp2A9idSZE+YK031TQ
=fIx3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

>
> How would you recommend restating this?  Can you edit that talking
> point to make it so?
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Talking_Points#NetBeans_6.8_first_IDE_to_support_entire_Java_6_EE_spec

I hope your pointing to victorv with this question. I am only barely
on the fringes of the Java community, and only because I admin some
JBoss app servers and quite a few Java apps at $dayjob. And reading
over this talking point - I am not sure if it my earlier statement is
completely on topic - the talking point is referring to NetBeans, not
openjdk, though I think the same principle ('Java 6 EE spec' confusion
with java-1.6.0-sun)


>
>> JavaFX SDK appears to not be F/LOSS
>> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JavaFX#License)
>
> Right, mjw was noting this as well.  I'm sending a copy of this email
> to victorv who's listed as the netbeans maintainer, to get him to edit
> this wiki page so that we are promoting only free software.
>
> --
> Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
>  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
>  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
>          Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com
> --
> marketing mailing list
> marketing at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
>