EPEL6 announcement feedback

[Rahul Sundaram]

On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 03:13:43 +0530
> Rahul Sundaram <metherid at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > You might want to note two things.  A)  It is fully compatible with
> > RHEL 6 and does not replace or conflict with anything in the base
> > repository and that EPEL enforces this via a policy.  B)  This is a
> > community repository and not commercially supported by Red Hat.
>
> ok. How about a second paragraph that reads:
>
> EPEL6 packages never replace RHEL6 packages, only build on them and
> are fully compatible with RHEL6. EPEL is a community supported and
> maintained project, and it's packages are not commercially supported by
> Red Hat.
>
> Or should that read better at the end?
>

I would suggest:

EPEL 6 packages is a complimentary and compatible add-on repository and
provides additional packages for RHEL 6 or compatible rebuilds and does not
replace any RHEL 6 packages.  EPEL is a community project maintained and
supported by volunteers (via bugzilla and mailing lists) as part of the
Fedora Project and is not commercially supported by Red Hat.

Rahul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/attachments/20110118/dc9ab210/attachment.html