Talking Points

[Ruth Suehle]

That seems reasonable too.


On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Ben Cotton <bcotton at fedoraproject.org>wrote:

> It seems like the talking points are basically a re-skin of the
> release notes and announcement. Can the Marketing team build the
> talking points directly from those two documents? I don't see a need
> for the Docs team to draft another version of documents we already
> produce.
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Ruth Suehle <rsuehle at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> as I mentioned it today on docs meeting - there was agreement
> >> with marketing, that docs team is going to write the announcement
> >> and it will be polished/"marketized" by marketing team. But we
> >> still have Talking Points - current SOP says, marketing team is
> >> owner [1].
> >
> >
> > I think they could benefit from the same process of write/marketize.
> >
> > --
> > docs mailing list
> > docs at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe:
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
>
>
>
> --
> Ben Cotton
> Fedora Docs Leader
> --
> docs mailing list
> docs at lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/attachments/20121210/0d716f7f/attachment.html>