Feedback from Distrowatch

[Abhishek Singh]

On 05/09/2012 03:16 AM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
> ----- "Danishka Navin" <danishka at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:06 AM, inode0 < inode0 at gmail.com > wrote:
>>
>> If it is confused with other logos from a similar product space then
>> it isn't perfect. It may well be no fault of the logo but it is a
>> problem.
>>
>> If a lot of someones think it is related to Facebook then it is a
>> problem worth thinking about before it gets completely out of control.
>> We have seen other hints that this confusion exists in the past as
>> well.
>>
>> Admitting we have a brand problem which seems to be related to some
>> similar aspects that exist in our logo and in Facebook's logo doesn't
>> mean we need to abandon our logo. Are there other ways available to us
>> to mitigate this confusion? Perhaps advertising Fedora more widely so
>> more people are exposed to our brand more often? Perhaps something
>> else?
>>
>> it would be great if we could identify the region/location of those
>> people.
>> but there is no such information i guess.
>>
>> I think we should increase our presence in the social media specially
>> in Facebook itself.
>>
> Maybe it's something that Red Hat legal should have handled years ago and didn't?
>
> -- Bob
Fedora Logo has a long established base, and changing the logo would not
be a good decision in my opinion.

-- 
Abhishek Singh
FOSS Nepal Community
http://wiki.fossnepal.org


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/attachments/20120509/08672943/attachment.sig>