Copyright Submission Proposal

[Robyn Bergeron]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joe Brockmeier" <jzb at redhat.com>
> To: "Robyn Bergeron" <rbergero at redhat.com>, "Fedora Marketing team" <marketing at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Cc: legal at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 11:01:01 AM
> Subject: Re: Copyright Submission Proposal
> 
> On 03/26/2014 12:55 PM, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
> > #2: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 is listed in
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing as a license that isn't
> > acceptable for Fedora. I realize you're citing 4.0 here, and we don't
> > have guidance on 4.0 in the wiki, but I have to imagine it's not going
> > to be much of a change. The NC part is still NC... as you said, it's the
> > most restrictive, and at least in my opinion, restrictiveness isn't
> > exactly freedom-enabling :)
> 
> Yeah, my bad.
> 
> I have my reasons for preferring the NC, myself, but as I said - I'll go
> along with whatever the project/group prefer.
> 
> My main point is we should have one CC license content is published
> under, and authors should know and agree to that when they put stuff on
> the magazine.
> 
> As for the magazine being hooked up to FAS - have we been checking that
> all submissions come from people who've signed the FPCA? It's not
> automated.

I guess the question I'm asking (to be more clear): If I get access to publish something to the Magazine, how is that access granted? Am I added to a FAS group, which in turn provides permissions for access? Or is the addition to the magazine author/editor list done manually?

> 
> Best,
> 
> jzb
> --
> Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst
> jzb at redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
> Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/
>