The future of Shotwell in Fedora

[charles profitt]

On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 16:27 -0500, Bryan Sutherland wrote:
> I have to agree with Paul. Perhaps it would be good to angle it as
> “With Shotwell being forked, it’s future in Fedora may be limited...
> These {X number of} replacement options are vying for top spot...”
>  
> It would be great to include Darktable in with the options as well as
> it’s one of the most capable tools available to manage photos.
>  

Thanks for the feedback. I was looking at it from a different angle
when writing it - more of a call to action for contributors to give
feedback. Let me look at the other angle and see how I can change the
point of view and add a few more options that have not been mentioned
in that mailing list discussion.


-- 
Charles Profitt
Open Source Advocate
https://ftbeowulf.wordpress.com/

4096R/37BEB021
D8A5 6061 25C3 28B7 2264 2B39 3E13 4DD2 37BE B021


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/attachments/20151130/17914732/attachment.sig>