Magazine content license

[Bryan Sutherland]

I think this conversation came up a while ago and fell by the wayside due
to a lack of consensus.

An attribution licence has the potential to expand the reach and authority
of the site and would the match the wiki (IIRC).

Maybe a broadcast to everyone in the "authors" and above groups would be in
order.

+1 to CC-BY-SA

On Friday, January 23, 2015, Ryan Lerch <rlerch at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Just wondering if it is worth considering making all the content on Fedora
> Magazine a CC license. (CC-BY-SA maybe?)
>
> At the moment it is not very clear how each post is licensed. Of course,
> we will need to contact all previous authors to check that this change is
> OK.
>
> thoughts?
>
> cheers,
> ryanlerch
> --
> marketing mailing list
> marketing at lists.fedoraproject.org
> List info or to change your subscription:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/attachments/20150123/ba3584c8/attachment.html>