Current role list and workflow reminder

Paul W. Frields stickster at gmail.com
Fri Jul 31 20:35:56 UTC 2015


Sorry to be late coming back to this, Chaoyi, and thanks for the
question.  I put a WhenIsGood here:

http://whenisgood.net/fmag-editorial

This editorial meeting is intended primarily for folks who are:

* Editors
* Administrators but really intending to be editors
* Administrators who want to stay that way
* Contributors with near-native command of English who want to be
  editors

Other folks are welcome to join.  This meeting would be intended
primarily to sort out scheduling strategy and assignments, as opposed
to sorting through ideas.  (That can be done through pitches to this
list, or if someone wants, they could set up a pitch meeting!)


On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 09:03:22PM +0000, Chaoyi Zha wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> Having a weekly gathering sounds like a good idea, especially to get caught
> up on the latest events. However, 1200 UTC (8 AM EST?) is a bit of an
> inconvenient time for me. What day will this be happening at, and is the
> date flexible?
> 
> Thanks!
> Chaoyi
> 
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 at 17:01 Paul W. Frields <stickster at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > I was talking to Mr. Managing Editor[1] about reviving the idea of a
> > management meeting and workflow for posts.
> >
> > http://fedoramagazine.org/publishing-workflow/
> >
> > Ryan put this page (unlinked) together to describe the publication
> > workflow and roles.  There are some tools in the WordPress instance
> > itself to help us maintain a schedule of posts.  I think that would
> > work well with this workflow.  There are some other helpful pages
> > available too, but this one relates to some info below.
> >
> > To use the workflow effectively, I think it's helpful to have a short
> > weekly gathering, at a reasonably suitable time, to get people
> > assigned to edit and schedule posts.  If we try for something between
> > hours of 1200 and 1400 UTC (currently, adjust for daylight time
> > later), would that work OK for interested folks?
> >
> > * * *
> >
> > I wasn't sure people were aware of the current role memberships on the
> > Magazine, so while I was logged in I decided to take accounting:
> >
> > * Editor: dustymabe, kushal, roshi
> >
> > * Author: adamw, amitshah, amsharma, ankursinha, arg, ashutoshbhakare,
> >   Award3535, bckurera, blacksmith, churchyard, cwickert, dwalsh,
> >   eischmann, emichan, gerd, giuseppep, immanetize, inode0, jkurik,
> >   jomoos, jstribny, kinitrupti, kiso49j, krazyabouttechnology,
> >   langdon, mailga, markdude, markllama, mattn, mhayden, phantomhell,
> >   pingou, pravins, rikkiendsley, scollier, siddhesh, sparks, tatica,
> >   tforsman, williamjmorenor
> >
> > * Administrator: chrisroberts, cydrobolt, duffy, jreznik, jzb, mattdm,
> >   Mitzie, nb, pfrields, randomuser, robyduck, rsuehle, ryanlerch,
> >   sgallagh
> >
> > Right now the default user role is Subscriber, but promotion to Author
> > should be widely encouraged for anyone who wants to pitch or draft
> > something.
> >
> > There's a Contributor role but it doesn't seem to have much utility
> > beyond the Author role AFAICT.
> >
> > The only difference between Editor and Administrator seems to be the
> > ability to twiddle the WordPress configuration, which should only
> > needed occasionally.  I'd recommend we move all but maybe 5-7
> > Administrators to the Editor role, being careful to maintain global
> > coverage with that group.  Any Editor can edit and publish stories so
> > this should have no effect on our ability to move material quickly.
> >
> >
> > [1]
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/2015-March/017230.html


-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
    The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com


More information about the marketing mailing list