fedora magazine: system-upgrade to F23

[Justin W. Flory]

Hey Kamil,

Thanks for the information. I didn't get a chance to update the article
earlier today, but I just added these edits to the article. They should
be visible now.

    http://fedoramagazine.org/upgrading-from-fedora-22-to-fedora-23/

Let me know if these changes look alright to you. Thanks again for the
pointers.

--
Cheers,
Justin W. Flory
jflory7 at fedoraproject.org

On 11/09/2015 11:29 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Hello Justin,
> 
> I'm from Fedora QA and I'm writing regarding
> http://fedoramagazine.org/upgrading-from-fedora-22-to-fedora-23/
> 
> Could you please make a few adjustments to that article?
> 
> 1. --best should no longer be necessary with latest system-upgrade (0.7), we try to minimize the chance of upgrading just a half of your system. I have to admit I'm not actually sure whether there are or not some cases where it can make a difference, but I think we should be quite OK without recommending it by default.
> 2. --allowerasing should definitely be mentioned, it will be needed if some package needs to be removed (e.g. retired package or with broken deps, most likely third party)
> 3. we have a bug in dnf regarding certain locales like Chinese and Japanese. Can you please point people to a workaround here? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F23_bugs#system-upgrade-locale
> 
> I can put all of that into comments under that article, but most people won't notice it. It would be much better if it was in the article :)
> 
> Thanks,
> Kamil
> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 474 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/attachments/20151110/df8ac7dd/attachment.sig>