[Magazine] Discussion about Shotwell article

Justin W. Flory jflory7 at gmail.com
Sun Jan 17 18:59:15 UTC 2016

On 01/15/2016 12:58 PM, Sylvia Sánchez wrote:
> Flory: I said about Digikam exactly the opposite. I said Digikam is
> way more complicated and featured than Shotwell. They aren't
> exchangeable.

Okay, thanks for the clarification. Seeing as how Charles has a lot 
going on right now, that would be awesome if you could work on this 
article too. I'm not as familiar with these programs so it would be 
fantastic if you did some research on good alternatives. :)

Justin W. Flory
jflory7 at gmail.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/attachments/20160117/c09896e7/attachment.sig>

More information about the marketing mailing list