[Marketing] [Magazine] Darktable article

James Bishop james at jamesbishop.ca
Wed Mar 23 12:51:04 UTC 2016

On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 09:10 +0100, Germano Massullo wrote:
> 2016-03-23 5:34 GMT+01:00 S.Kemter <sirko.kemter at gmail.com>:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > You are aware that we dropped DT for a library bundling reason? I
> > didnt
> > follow it, but there was some trouble a while ago, I dont know its
> > solved.
> If you do not know how it solved, you should not write that darktable
> has been dropped, because it did not. darktable is fully working and
> up-to-date in all Fedora repositories.
> James Bishop, it is a great idea. Only a thing to keep in mind:
> darktable is written with downcase 'd', upstream developers seem to
> care a a lot about that (and yes I used to call it Darktable for a
> long time LOL).
> F22 and F23 repositories contain the older version, so to try the new
> 2.x major release you have to use F24 or use my Copr repo [1] for F22
> and F23
> [1]: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/germano/Darktable_2.0_re
> lease_candidate/

Hi Germano,

Thanks for the clarification. I was actually unsure about whether to
use an uppercase or lowercase 'd', and I appreciate having that cleared

Regarding the version of darktable to use, would it be better to base
the article(s) on the newest version, or the version currently
available in the Fedora repos (which is showing as 1.6.9 on my


More information about the marketing mailing list