F18 Beta Blocker Bug Review #9 Minutes
Tim Flink
tflink at redhat.com
Wed Nov 21 19:03:27 UTC 2012
====================================
#fedora-qa: f18beta-blocker-review-9
====================================
Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-qa/2012-11-21/f18beta-blocker-review-9.2012-11-21-17.03.html
Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-qa/2012-11-21/f18beta-blocker-review-9.2012-11-21-17.03.txt
Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-qa/2012-11-21/f18beta-blocker-review-9.2012-11-21-17.03.log.html
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (tflink, 17:03:21)
* Introduction (tflink, 17:13:01)
* Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have
bugs. (tflink, 17:13:50)
* We'll be following the process outlined at: (tflink, 17:13:57)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(tflink, 17:13:57)
* The bugs up for review today are available at: (tflink, 17:14:02)
* LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (tflink,
17:14:03)
* The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (tflink,
17:14:09)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Alpha_Release_Criteria
(tflink, 17:14:10)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Beta_Release_Criteria
(tflink, 17:14:10)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Final_Release_Criteria
(tflink, 17:14:10)
* Up for review today, there are: (tflink, 17:14:27)
* 4 Proposed Blockers (tflink, 17:14:33)
* 8 Accepted Blockers (tflink, 17:14:33)
* 1 Proposed NTH (tflink, 17:14:33)
* 22 Accepted NTH (tflink, 17:14:33)
* (878225) unlock of VG w/ multiple encrypted PVs in custom leads to
traceback (tflink, 17:15:50)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878225 (tflink,
17:15:53)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (tflink, 17:15:55)
* AGREED: 878225 - RejectedBlocker (beta) - This doesn't clearly hit
any of the F18 beta release criterion and seems to be outside the
most common paths - this doesn't prevent installs on the machine and
thus, rejected as blocker (tflink, 17:24:27)
* (875942) KeyError: None (tflink, 17:25:32)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875942 (tflink,
17:25:33)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (tflink, 17:25:33)
* AGREED: 875942 - RejectedBlocker (beta) - This doesn't clearly hit
any of the F18 beta release criteria and seems to be outside the
most common paths - this doesn't prevent installs on affected
machines and thus is rejected as a blocker for F18 beta. (tflink,
17:31:02)
* (878967) Installation fails when selecting german language (tflink,
17:31:31)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878967 (tflink,
17:31:31)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 17:31:31)
* LINK: http://fpaste.org/UE5w (adamw, 17:34:09)
* LINK: http://94.247.144.115/anaconda.png (tflink, 17:36:54)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864622 seems to be
a change related to man pages (drago01, 18:09:30)
* may be related to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569392
(tflink, 18:20:59)
* LINK: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4713781
(drago01, 18:24:07)
* AGREED: 878967 - This could be a blocker but it needs more triage to
figure out exactly what's going on and if other languages are
affected. Will re-visit once more information is available.
(tflink, 18:32:15)
* (877871) KeyError: None (tflink, 18:33:58)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877871 (tflink,
18:33:58)
* Proposed NTH, anaconda, ASSIGNED (tflink, 18:33:58)
* AGREED: 877871 - RejectedNTH - This seems like a rather non-standard
use case and avoidable enough to not take a fix past freeze.
(tflink, 18:38:31)
* (878959) firewall-config can't set permanent rule (tflink, 18:38:40)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878959 (tflink,
18:38:40)
* Proposed NTH, firewalld, MODIFIED (tflink, 18:38:41)
* AGREED: 878959 - RejectedNTH - This could be fixed with an update
and thus, does not need to be pulled in past freeze and does not
qualify for NTH status. (tflink, 18:43:15)
* (868755) rsync error handling - UEFI and live installs without enough
space (tflink, 18:43:50)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868755 (tflink,
18:43:54)
* Accepted Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (tflink, 18:43:56)
* this has been tested with RC1 and appears to have been fixed
(tflink, 18:44:42)
* move to VERIFIED (tflink, 18:44:48)
* (872047) fedup-dracut builds do not exist in F18 (tflink, 18:45:10)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872047 (tflink,
18:45:10)
* Accepted Blocker, fedup-dracut, ON_QA (tflink, 18:45:10)
* builds exist in updates-testing and were pulled into RC1 (tflink,
18:45:24)
* builds need testing and karma (tflink, 18:45:32)
* (873459) Upgraded system does not reboot if a kernel upgrade is part
of the upgrade (tflink, 18:47:10)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873459 (tflink,
18:47:13)
* Accepted Blocker, fedup-dracut, ON_QA (tflink, 18:47:16)
* this appears to have been fixed from limited testing (tflink,
18:48:30)
* it will be moved to VERIFIED if more detailed/varied testing holds
up (tflink, 18:48:45)
* (876366) New kernel copies its args from the Upgrade System entry
(tflink, 18:48:57)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876366 (tflink,
18:48:57)
* Accepted Blocker, fedup-dracut, MODIFIED (tflink, 18:48:57)
* this appears to have been fixed in limited testing (tflink,
18:49:45)
* will move to VERIFIED after a more detailed verification (tflink,
18:49:57)
* (876655) Lorax does not support building initramfs for fedup (tflink,
18:50:25)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876655 (tflink,
18:50:25)
* Accepted Blocker, lorax, MODIFIED (tflink, 18:50:25)
* RC1 does include upgrade.img built by lorax (tflink, 18:50:55)
* this has been fixed, moving to VERIFIED (tflink, 18:51:43)
* Open Floor (tflink, 18:53:52)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/975 (nirik, 18:54:07)
* fesco has not yet decided whether secureboot functionality is a
blocker for F18 beta (tflink, 18:54:50)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/975 (tflink, 18:55:00)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/974 also needs input. ;)
(nirik, 18:58:14)
* fesco is also deciding whether to loosen the "1 week slips only"
policy (tflink, 18:59:40)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/974 (tflink, 18:59:51)
* input to the decision process would (probably) be appreciated by
fesco (tflink, 19:00:18)
* The next blocker review meeting (if needed, pending go/no-go
decision) will be on 2012-11-28 @ 17:00 UTC (tflink, 19:00:55)
Meeting ended at 19:01:47 UTC.
Action Items
------------
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* tflink (203)
* adamw (108)
* kparal (54)
* drago01 (43)
* jreznik (20)
* nirik (19)
* jreznik_ (11)
* akshayvyas (9)
* zodbot (5)
* robatino (2)
* satellit_e (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/meetingminutes/attachments/20121121/1d25c516/attachment.sig>
More information about the meetingminutes
mailing list