F20 Beta Blocker Bug Review #2 Minutes
Tim Flink
tflink at redhat.com
Wed Oct 2 18:09:59 UTC 2013
================================================
#fedora-blocker-review: f20beta-blocker-review-2
================================================
Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-10-02/f20beta-blocker-review-2.2013-10-02-16.00.html
Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-10-02/f20beta-blocker-review-2.2013-10-02-16.00.txt
Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-10-02/f20beta-blocker-review-2.2013-10-02-16.00.log.html
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (tflink, 16:00:25)
* Introduction (tflink, 16:04:09)
* Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and freeze
exception bugs. (tflink, 16:04:14)
* We'll be following the process outlined at: (tflink, 16:04:19)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(tflink, 16:04:19)
* The bugs up for review today are available at: (tflink, 16:04:29)
* LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (tflink,
16:04:29)
* The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (tflink,
16:04:35)
* Up for review today, we have: (tflink, 16:05:06)
* 9 Proposed Blockers (tflink, 16:05:34)
* 7 Accepted Blockers (tflink, 16:05:34)
* 1 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (tflink, 16:05:34)
* 4 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (tflink, 16:05:35)
* (1009809) KeyError: 'name' (tflink, 16:06:44)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009809 (tflink,
16:06:44)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ON_QA (tflink, 16:06:44)
* AGREED: 1009809 - This still needs testing to see if at least 1 of
nfs/nfsiso works - will revisit once that testing has been done
(tflink, 16:10:10)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012504 (tflink,
16:10:16)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (tflink, 16:10:16)
* AGREED: 1012504 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 beta
release criterion for btrfs custom partitions: "When using the
custom partitioning flow, the installer must be able to ... Create
mount points backed by ext4 partitions, LVM volumes or btrfs volumes
..." (tflink, 16:17:54)
* (1010495) Apple Mac EFI: you have not created a bootloader stage1
target device (tflink, 16:18:07)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010495 (tflink,
16:18:10)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, POST (tflink, 16:18:13)
* AGREED: 1010495 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 beta
release criterion for EFI system partitions on apple hardware:
"Cleanly install to a disk with a valid ms-dos or gpt disk label and
partition table which contains existing data and sufficient
unpartitioned space for a Fedora installation" (tflink, 16:25:03)
* (1013800) devicetree.py:1293:handleVgLvs:DeviceTreeError: failed to
look up thin pool (tflink, 16:25:15)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013800 (tflink,
16:25:18)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:25:21)
* AGREED: 1013800 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 beta
release criterion for LVM thinp: "When using the guided partitioning
flow, the installer must be able to ... Complete an installation
using any combination of disk configuration options it allows the
user to select" (tflink, 16:28:14)
* (1013586) SizeNotPositiveError: spec= param must be >=0 (tflink,
16:28:39)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013586 (tflink,
16:28:39)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:28:39)
* AGREED: 1013586 - We need more information and testing to figure out
how common this failure mode is. will re-visit once more testing has
been done. (tflink, 16:35:03)
* (1012646) anaconda creates grub.cfg lacking an initrd entry, kernel
panics on reboot (tflink, 16:35:42)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012646 (tflink,
16:35:45)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (tflink, 16:35:47)
* AGREED: 1012646 - RejectedBlocker - This is a problem but the actual
bug is in grubby, not anaconda and in this case, anaconda is
behaving as expected (tflink, 16:40:26)
* (1013087) selection of rescue kernel causes kernel panic, due to lack
of initramfs (tflink, 16:40:43)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013087 (tflink,
16:40:46)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:40:48)
* AGREED: 1013087 - RejectedBlocker - While unfortunate, this does not
violate any F20 beta release criteria and thus is rejected as a
release blocking issue for f20 beta (tflink, 16:53:10)
* (1013767) rootfs on thinp not found, startup failure (tflink,
16:53:35)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013767 (tflink,
16:53:35)
* Proposed Blocker, dracut, NEW (tflink, 16:53:35)
* AGREED: 1013767 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha
release criterion for LVM thinp autopart installs: "A system
installed with a release-blocking desktop must boot to a log in
screen where it is possible to log in to a working desktop using a
user account created during installation or a 'first boot' utility."
(tflink, 17:06:49)
* (864198) grubby fatal error updating grub.cfg when /boot is btrfs
(tflink, 17:06:59)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864198 (tflink,
17:07:02)
* Proposed Blocker, grubby, ASSIGNED (tflink, 17:07:05)
* AGREED: 864198 - RejectedBlocker - This does not clearly violate any
F20 beta criteria and is a corner case. Therefore, it does not
qualify as a release blocking bug for f20 beta. (tflink, 17:39:25)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980221 (adamw,
17:41:14)
* (1007590) Black screen after F20 graphical install on PPC64 (tflink,
17:44:05)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007590 (tflink,
17:44:08)
* Proposed Freeze Exceptions, glibc, ASSIGNED (tflink, 17:44:10)
* AGREED: 1007590 - AcceptedFreezeException - This is a showstopper
for PPC64 and while not PA, a tested fix would be considered past
freeze. (tflink, 17:47:29)
* (1000891) DVD is oversized (larger than 4.7 GB) (tflink, 17:53:34)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000891 (tflink,
17:53:34)
* Accepted Blocker, distribution, NEW (tflink, 17:53:35)
* ACTION: jreznik to start investigating ways to trim down the dvd
size or find someone to do it (tflink, 17:59:38)
* DVD still oversize, needs discussion/changes to get it back under
4.7 GB (tflink, 18:00:04)
* Open Floor (tflink, 18:04:01)
* next blocker review meeting will be 2013-10-09 @ 16:00 UTC (tflink,
18:06:00)
Meeting ended at 18:07:58 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* jreznik to start investigating ways to trim down the dvd size or find
someone to do it
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* jreznik
* jreznik to start investigating ways to trim down the dvd size or
find someone to do it
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* tflink (240)
* cmurf (181)
* adamw (179)
* Viking-Ice (110)
* kparal (56)
* roshi (37)
* dan408 (37)
* zodbot (11)
* jreznik (10)
* handsome_pirate (9)
* mkrizek (1)
* pwhalen (1)
* pschindl (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/meetingminutes/attachments/20131002/84aeea13/attachment.sig>
More information about the meetingminutes
mailing list