adamwill's meeting titled "F22-blocker-review" ended in #fedora-blocker-review
notifications at fedoraproject.org
notifications at fedoraproject.org
Mon Apr 20 19:01:34 UTC 2015
==========================================
#fedora-blocker-review: F22-blocker-review
==========================================
Meeting started by adamw at 16:00:05 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-04-20/f22-blocker-review.2015-04-20-16.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (adamw, 16:00:05)
* pschindl will secretarialize (adamw, 16:02:58)
* Introduction (adamw, 16:03:16)
* Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have
bugs. (adamw, 16:03:16)
* We'll be following the process outlined at: (adamw, 16:03:16)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(adamw, 16:03:17)
* The bugs up for review today are available at: (adamw, 16:03:18)
* LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (adamw,
16:03:20)
* The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (adamw,
16:03:21)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Alpha_Release_Criteria
(adamw, 16:03:23)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Beta_Release_Criteria
(adamw, 16:03:25)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Final_Release_Criteria
(adamw, 16:03:29)
* 18 Proposed Blockers (adamw, 16:03:50)
* 6 Accepted Blockers (adamw, 16:03:51)
* 0 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (adamw, 16:03:51)
* 1 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (adamw, 16:03:51)
* (1209460) Use langtable for console font information (adamw,
16:05:12)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209460 (adamw,
16:05:12)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (adamw, 16:05:13)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Final_Release_Criteria#Installer_translations
(danofsatx, 16:20:02)
* AGREED: 1209460 - RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException - we
agreed this looks like a significant issue for users of affected
languages, but it didn't quite seem to cross the threshold to
violating any of the release criteria. We would very much like to
see it fixed however (adamw, 16:22:38)
* (1209563) Many strings not translated in live installation (adamw,
16:22:46)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209563 (adamw,
16:22:46)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, POST (adamw, 16:22:46)
* AGREED: 1209563 - AcceptedBlocker - this violates "The installer
must correctly display all sufficiently complete translations
available for use." (adamw, 16:28:16)
* (1210003) "installation destination" gui becomes unresponsive after a
cancel on "reclaim space" (adamw, 16:28:24)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210003 (adamw,
16:28:24)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (adamw, 16:28:25)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Alpha_Release_Criteria#Installation_interfaces
(danofsatx, 16:31:24)
* AGREED: 1210003 - AcceptedBlocker - conditional violation of "When
using a dedicated installer image, the installer must be able to
complete an installation using the text, graphical and VNC
installation interfaces.", the condition being you need to cancel
out of this screen. (adamw, 16:39:11)
* (1210254) re-using partitions inside LUKS automatically checked for
encryption (adamw, 16:39:19)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210254 (adamw,
16:39:19)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (adamw, 16:39:19)
* AGREED: 1210254 - RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException - as
described there's nothing here that really violates the criteria,
the installed system seems to be operable, though not what would be
reasonably expected, so accepted as a freeze exception issue.
(adamw, 16:51:39)
* (1212206) System doesn't boot with LVM data volume on iSCSI (adamw,
16:51:49)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212206 (adamw,
16:51:49)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (adamw, 16:51:49)
* AGREED: 1212206 - AcceptedBlocker - violates "The installer must be
able to detect (if possible) and install to supported
network-attached storage devices. Supported network-attached storage
types include iSCSI, Fibre Channel and Fibre Channel over Ethernet
(FCoE)." (adamw, 16:55:59)
* (1209941) upgraded system does not reboot automatically, ctrl+alt+del
is needed: Failed unmounting /sysroot/proc (adamw, 16:56:09)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209941 (adamw,
16:56:09)
* Proposed Blocker, fedup-dracut, NEW (adamw, 16:56:09)
* AGREED: 1209941 - (tentatively) AcceptedBlocker - it's clear we
don't have all the information here, but upgrade apparently fairly
commonly failing to reboot is considered a conditional violation of
the 'upgrade requirements' criterion, due to the remote system
scenario cited in comment #7 (adamw, 17:07:44)
* (1210047) [abrt] gnome-contacts: _g_log_abort():
gnome-contacts-search-provider killed by SIGTRAP (adamw, 17:07:51)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210047 (adamw,
17:07:52)
* Proposed Blocker, gnome-contacts, NEW (adamw, 17:07:52)
* AGREED: 1210047 - punt, request further testing - we're not yet sure
whether this is reproducible or a one-off thing, so we'll ask for
further testing to find out (adamw, 17:20:08)
* (1208526) [abrt] gnome-shell: xkb_keymap_unref(): gnome-shell killed
by SIGSEGV (adamw, 17:20:13)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208526 (adamw,
17:20:14)
* Proposed Blocker, gnome-shell, NEW (adamw, 17:20:14)
* AGREED: 1208526 - RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException - this
doesn't appear to violate any criterion and seems fixable with an
update, the impact is annoying but not critical, by the description
(adamw, 17:40:46)
* (1211887) Newly created menuentry title is nonsense (adamw, 17:41:58)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211887 (adamw,
17:41:58)
* Proposed Blocker, grubby, ON_QA (adamw, 17:41:58)
* AGREED: 1211887 - RejectedBlocker - as the affected grubby build
never went stable, there is no need to treat this bug as a release
blocker. (adamw, 17:47:33)
* (1206862) Hotkeys not functional on Asus X550ZE (adamw, 17:47:45)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206862 (adamw,
17:47:45)
* Proposed Blocker, kernel, NEW (adamw, 17:47:45)
* AGREED: 1206862 - RejectedBlocker - this is hardware-specific (model
or manufacturer) and in non-blocking functionality in any case
(adamw, 17:51:11)
* (1207366) Fedora 21 as an IPv6 tunnel endpoint (sit) gives severely
crippled download speed over the tunnel (adamw, 17:51:17)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207366 (adamw,
17:51:17)
* Proposed Blocker, kernel, NEW (adamw, 17:51:18)
* AGREED: 1207366 - RejectedBlocker - there's no criteria violation
here, and we think it's correct there's no criteria covering this
area of functionality, it is too much of a niche concern to block
the release. (adamw, 17:57:15)
* (1166650) [abrt] liveusb-creator:
connection.py:651:call_blocking:DBusException:
org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.UnknownMethod: Method "Get" with signature
"ss" on interface "org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" doesn't exist
(adamw, 17:57:23)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166650 (adamw,
17:57:23)
* Proposed Blocker, liveusb-creator, NEW (adamw, 17:57:23)
* AGREED: 1166650 - AcceptedBlocker - violates "Release-blocking live
and dedicated installer images must boot when written to optical
media of an appropriate size (if applicable) and when written to a
USB stick with any of the officially supported methods." (Beta),
this is a 'special blocker' as the bug is in luc itself, it is
resolved when an update is issued for F20/F21 and Windows (or luc is
taken out of the list of 'supported methods') (adamw, 18:07:16)
* (1212180) Window is blank / doesn't load fully or draw properly or
something (adamw, 18:07:32)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212180 (adamw,
18:07:32)
* Proposed Blocker, liveusb-creator, ASSIGNED (adamw, 18:07:32)
* AGREED: 1212180 - RejectedBlocker (22 Final) AcceptedBlocker (23
Beta) - bugs in the USB creation tools are considered most important
for *subsequent* releases, so this is a 23 Beta blocker under the
footnotes of "All release-blocking images must boot in their
supported configurations." in the Beta criteria (adamw, 18:14:47)
* (1212009) network sometimes doesn't start, on both installed system
and netinst (adamw, 18:15:07)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212009 (adamw,
18:15:07)
* Proposed Blocker, NetworkManager, NEW (adamw, 18:15:08)
* AGREED: 1212009 - RejectedBlocker - this is a provisional rejection:
as we haven't seen any other reports of this it seems like it might
be a very unusual case (perhaps related to both the hardware and the
router?) and so not worthy of blocker status, it can be re-proposed
if further research suggests it's more common than we thought
(adamw, 18:27:42)
* (1160424) MDRaidError: name_from_md_node(md126p1) failed (adamw,
18:27:50)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160424 (adamw,
18:27:50)
* Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, ASSIGNED (adamw, 18:27:50)
* AGREED: 1160424 - punt for information - this is at least
potentially a blocker, but it depends how commonly it occurs (it
does not affect *all* firmware RAID installs). New information seems
to be arriving quite often, so we will check in next week and see if
this is clearer then. (adamw, 18:35:57)
* (1210045) AVC Denials after i386 Workstation netinst (adamw,
18:36:05)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210045 (adamw,
18:36:05)
* Proposed Blocker, selinux-policy, ASSIGNED (adamw, 18:36:05)
* AGREED: 1210045 - punt - adamw couldn't reproduce this today and the
report is short on detail, let's give roshi a chance to provide more
info (adamw, 18:43:16)
* (1200559) [abrt] totem: browse_cb(): totem killed by SIGABRT (adamw,
18:43:26)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200559 (adamw,
18:43:27)
* Proposed Blocker, totem, NEW (adamw, 18:43:27)
* AGREED: 1200559 - AcceptedBlocker - clear violation of criterion
"All applications that can be launched using the standard graphical
mechanism of a release-blocking desktop after a default installation
of that desktop must start successfully and withstand a basic
functionality test." (adamw, 18:53:05)
* (1201877) xorg-x11-drv-qxl is FTBFS on aarch64 (adamw, 18:53:20)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201877 (adamw,
18:53:20)
* Proposed Blocker, xorg-x11-server, NEW (adamw, 18:53:20)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures (adamw,
18:57:31)
* AGREED: 1201877 - RejectedBlocker - this appears to be an issue in a
secondary architecture, and cannot possibly block the release.
(adamw, 18:59:42)
* Open floor (adamw, 18:59:55)
Meeting ended at 19:01:24 UTC.
Action Items
------------
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* adamw (266)
* danofsatx (102)
* pschindl (68)
* sgallagh (10)
* roshi (5)
* pwhalen (4)
* zodbot (4)
* tonghuix (3)
* dgilmore (2)
* nirik (1)
* satellit_e (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-04-20/f22-blocker-review.2015-04-20-16.00.html
--
You received this message due to your preference settings at
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/fmnmeetingminutes.id.fedoraproject.org/email/29368
More information about the meetingminutes
mailing list